Search for: "State v. Town of Grants"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,060
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
After being redrawn by the state legislature, Tuskegee had gone from basically a large square to a much smaller 28-sided town. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
Felix v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:07 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2022.html Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 7:24 am
Egbert v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 10:35 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
State (S.C. 1998), upholding a temporary restraining order in such a case, and U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
" Dissent: Whatever the Fifth said, there's two meanings of "necessary," and this ain't the one from McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"The failure to negotiate in good faith is an improper employment practice" (Matter of Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"The failure to negotiate in good faith is an improper employment practice" (Matter of Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
In the Court’s view, the order granted was wide in its ambit, and did not specify or identify exactly what information was requested. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am
While the High Court found Morison liable for trademark infringement as well as passing-off, the trial judge did not make a finding of copyright infringement, stating that as the designer of the device was not called to testify, copyright ownership was not sufficiently proven. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
The Court granted a default despite numerous technical mistakes, but did not grant any injunctive relief because the plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient. [read post]
