Search for: "State v. True"
Results 221 - 240
of 21,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
The Appeals Court said, "Having reviewed the dismissal de novo, assuming that the facts stated in the complaint are true, Lambeth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 6:48 pm
See State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
The State should have affirmatively advised the trial court that such report either did or did not exist or, if the State was likewise uncertain, ought to have sought from the court the opportunity to clarify whether such report was made. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
See Board of Trustees of State University of N.Y. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:14 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:29 pm
Mitze v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:14 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
Defendant's Motion for Judicial Notice dated August13, 2007, filed in State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
Google, Buza v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
It is certainly true that state insider trading law is not preempted by federal law. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am
Colvin, June 24, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Crespo v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
In a published decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit discussed burdens of proof and the “true doubt” rule with respect to Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”) claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm
If true, it would be difficult to see how the prosecution could secure a conviction in light of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:14 pm
(McCall v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am
COUNSEL It’s true. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
“The District Court’s conclusion of law is affirmed: Montana’s right to a clean and healthful environment and environmental life support system includes a stable climate system, which is clearly within the object and true principles of the Framers inclusion of the right to a clean and healthful environment. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Cohen v California, 403 U.S. [read post]
