Search for: "Stevens v. Little"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 7:03 pm
" Josh Blackman has a blog post titled "Analysis of Supplemental Briefing in Zubik v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
Supreme Court's refusal on September 28 to grant a stay requested in Valle v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
I also found a discussion of Fred Rogers' testimony in Justice Stevens' opinion in Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
Justices Stevens and Souter both wrote opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
Also mentioned are SCOTUS's invalidation of an anti-cruelty law in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
First up is Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:01 pm
In the landmark case Hamdan v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
I have been absolutely swamped at work so it's been a little difficult to find time to analyze the Salazar v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 7:32 pm
Dinkel in R. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:30 pm
The means by which the Puma design was invalidated is perhaps a little troubling. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
Perry v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:20 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Supreme Court oral arguments and the absence of cameras from those arguments. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
" Surprisingly, though, for as central a role as Pressley may yet come to play in the current cases, exceedingly little has been written about the decision, and there are no sustained academic treatments of Justice Stevens's cryptic holding. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 10:03 am
(See post 79.)It's a shame that Stevens' tone was so polite and studiously non-personal that his scathing comment on Scalia's intellectual dishonesty went right over the head of the reporter.But lest anyone think that John Paul Stevens is a paragon of intellectual honesty, consider his concurrence in this spring's Georgia v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
Stevens, 559 U. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
