Search for: "Strange v. Powers"
Results 221 - 240
of 960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 5:04 pm
Meyer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 pm
They suggest that a decision striking down the mandate would be another Citizens United or, worse, Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
Given the power of the modern president--who, incidentally, is prone to declare "exceptional situations" in all sorts of circumstances in order to enhance his own power--we ought to be more willing to try to make sure that we can sleep at night with a given incumbent in office. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:42 am
The Court draws from the Seventh Circuit's ruling in Bloch v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In Holder v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products, owned the… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Wide powers are available to enforce that control. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Riegel v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital and Botham (FC) v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58 – read judgment. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
American Electric Power Co. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
Excerpt: [Washington v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
Strangely, although the government scoffs at the use of that provision to preempt these non-label claims, it relies on it directly as the basis for explaining away the plain implications of Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
From property rights (e.g., Sackett v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:25 am
That may seem like a strange question. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
Abel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
In Sturgeon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:44 am
It has spoken of 'effective control' as the decisive matter, but in rehearsing other bases of extraterritorial application has stuck to the strange view that the powers of diplomatic agents and the like under general international law were somehow decisive as well. [read post]
