Search for: "Strange v. Powers" Results 221 - 240 of 960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
They suggest that a decision striking down the mandate would be another Citizens United or, worse, Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Given the power of the modern president--who, incidentally, is prone to declare "exceptional situations" in all sorts of circumstances in order to enhance his own power--we ought to be more willing to try to make sure that we can sleep at night with a given incumbent in office. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products, owned the… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am by Alasdair Henderson
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital and Botham (FC) v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58 – read judgment. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am by Ronald Mann
Strangely, although the government scoffs at the use of that provision to preempt these non-label claims, it relies on it directly as the basis for explaining away the plain implications of Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Ken Lammers
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:44 am by Tobias Thienel
It has spoken of 'effective control' as the decisive matter, but in rehearsing other bases of extraterritorial application has stuck to the strange view that the powers of diplomatic agents and the like under general international law were somehow decisive as well. [read post]