Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
However, on March 31, 2010, the United States Supreme Court filed its decision in Padilla v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
In Banos v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The court granted vacatur under United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
United States U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
Strickland v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:45 pm
Ct. 1194 (1963), and Strickland v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
The Georgia Attorney General counters in his opp that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is correct under a straightforward application of Strickland v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:22 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Reconsideration of Dismissal of Claims on Realty Subject to Civil Forfeiture in Fraud Case Denied
United States v. 479 Tamarind Drive, Hollandale, Florida
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
b.Did the Sixth Circuit exceed its authority under AEDPA when it applied United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
United States, the Court rejected the idea that police were required to obtain clarification about ambiguous requests for counsel before continuing their questioning. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
United States Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
