Search for: "Strickland v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
It is the defendant’s contention that judgment was obtained in violation of a right of his right under the constitution of this state or of the United States pursuant to C.P.L. 440.10(1)(h). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am by Albert Wan
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) states in a letter submitted by the People that defendant has been a permanent resident of the United States since 14 January 1998. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:41 am
Ed. 2d 674 (1984), for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims pursuant to the sixth amendment to the United States constitution. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Chappell12-5890Issue: (1) In Strickland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-820. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]