Search for: "Sullivan v. Doe" Results 221 - 240 of 1,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 9:33 am by Lee Sims
And, although the Times story focuses on what a user sees, that is, the interface, the story does point out that for some purposes, Bing appears to be (for now) the better search engine. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
  Their view does not necessarily comport with the reality of litigation. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:57 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Hamidas, 720 F.Supp.2d 183, 209 (E.D.N.Y.2010) ("[T]he fact that the petitioner in this case was represented by pro bono counsel does not provide a basis for disregarding the Convention's fee provision."); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:48 am by Jetta Sandin
And while we won’t know Judge Sullivan’s reasons for granting the preliminary injunction blocking the Staples/Office Depot merger (FTC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
Sullivan (1899) 126 Cal. 189, 193 ["the testimony must be clear, convincing, and conclusive - - something more than that modicum of evidence which appellate courts sometimes hold sufficient to warrant a finding"]; Jarnatt v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 5:40 am
§ 1981 does not expressly prohibit retaliation, stare decisis required the Court to find an implied right:"[C]onsiderations of stare decisis support our adherence to Sullivan [v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 2:47 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]