Search for: "Sullivan v. Doe" Results 221 - 240 of 1,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
Article 10 does not provide a universal justification for inflicting serious, and often unjustified, damage on the reputations of suspects. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
The U.S. contends that UNCLOS does not allow a coastal state like the PRC to use straight baselines around islands of an offshore archipelago; rather, only archipelagic states such as the Philippines and Indonesia, which consist entirely of islands, can do so. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
The U.S. contends that UNCLOS does not allow a coastal state like the PRC to use straight baselines around islands of an offshore archipelago; rather, only archipelagic states such as the Philippines and Indonesia, which consist entirely of islands, can do so. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Lapsley with: unimpeded access to the meat-and-poultry-related records and facilities of (i) Miller’s Organic Farm; (ii) Amos Miller Organic Farm; (iii) Amos Miller; and (iv) the agents, employees, workers, associates, and assigns of Miller’s Organic Farm, Amos Miller Organic Farm, and Amos Miller; Such unimpeded access shall extend to facilities and records used for any meat-and-poultry-related purpose (including but not limited to the purposes of storage, freezing, processing, or… [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  Did Judge Owens personally know any of the various Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers who were slammed in Judge Olguin's opinion? [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Nor does the PTO inquire into whether the famous person also sells the goods or services in question, as it does with private individuals under Section 1052(c). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]