Search for: "Sullivan v. Price" Results 221 - 240 of 286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
This session alone will be worth the price of admission. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Stateside, the first three chapters examine how the fundamental US/UK differences in attitude towards freedom of speech came about – principally with the bell tolling for reputational rights in 1964 when the case of New York Times v Sullivan (an index stalwart for practitioners) decided that, where allegations concern official conduct, a public official cannot bring a defamation claim unless able to show ‘actual malice’: the defamation law equivalent of the… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
Foreign exchange price fixing $2.3 billion In 2015, the parties in federal court in New York reported a $2.3 billion settlement over price fixing in foreign exchange markets. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Days later, the NRA alleges, its corporate insurance carrier severed ties with it and said it would not provide the NRA insurance at any price. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
According to Danny Sullivan, both Google and Bing agree that this replication of search results can occur in instances of weak signals.According to Sullivan, Google's test proves that the surfstream is a weak signal because even where Google was providing the sole signal or sole data for the nonsensical terms, Bing used this signal (data) only about 9% of the time. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3p9d9yn (Chris Dale) How to Choose an eDiscovery Tool and eDiscovery Vendor - http://tinyurl.com/3e6jy35 (Dera Nevin) Jane Doe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Eoin Daly
This was emphatically established in the early case NUR v Sullivan [1947] IR 77, where it was held that workers in a particular industry could not be forced to join only the trade union determined by a statutory tribunal. [read post]