Search for: "Sullivan v. Price"
Results 221 - 240
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
The New York Appellate Division dealt with that issue in Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
The New York Appellate Division dealt with that issue in Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
Moreover, the plaintiffs faced no significant threat of future antitrust harm in the absence of the injunction because, according to their experts, the market had become increasingly competitive and there is no longer any guarantee that the prices De Beers set would hold in the marketplace.The July 13, 2010, decision in Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:20 am
See Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am
A day before Judge Brody’s ruling, the Third Circuit vacated a $295 million settlement in the De Beers case, Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
As The Legal Intelligencer put it: In its 75-page opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Cusson v Quan 2007 ONCA 771). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am
Sullivan & Cromwell for UIL, Chadbourne & Parke for Iberdrola. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:52 pm
Much has been made of Judge Sullivan’s recent decision in City of New York v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
, The Price We Pay (Hill & Wang 1995).] [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
This changed with the rise of large daily newspapers in the mid-1800s and then broadcast radio and television in the early half of the 20th century.[5] Media providers were able to cross-subsidize news production independent of private or political patronage thanks to three things: (1) high-speed printing presses or broadcast facilities, (2) geographic-based market and pricing power, and (3) the widespread advertising base that was made possible by (1) and (2). [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:22 am
Though the Court of Appeals doesn’t say so explicitly in the City of Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P., New York (Nicole A. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
If you use a tax, you know what the price of emissions will be, but you don’t know the quantity of emissions; if you use a cap, you know the quantity but not the price. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE In SEC v. [read post]
