Search for: "Sullivan v. Price"
Results 221 - 240
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 7:58 am
We argue in the brief that even if a state can be permitted to enact anticompetitive laws under Parker v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
General Global pharmaceutical linkage regulations: A consortium framework (IP Osgoode) Pfizer rolling out generics to grab off-patent market (GenericsWeb) Australia: Too little too late: CSL Limited v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (No 2) and the judicial discretion to amend a patent (IP Whiteboard) Brazil: You lost your chance! [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
See this blog post for a discussion of the original three-judge panel decision from July, Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:47 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
See Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:37 am
" Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
The New York Appellate Division dealt with that issue in Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
The New York Appellate Division dealt with that issue in Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:20 am
See Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am
A day before Judge Brody’s ruling, the Third Circuit vacated a $295 million settlement in the De Beers case, Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
As The Legal Intelligencer put it: In its 75-page opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Cusson v Quan 2007 ONCA 771). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am
Sullivan & Cromwell for UIL, Chadbourne & Parke for Iberdrola. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:52 pm
Much has been made of Judge Sullivan’s recent decision in City of New York v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
, The Price We Pay (Hill & Wang 1995).] [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
This changed with the rise of large daily newspapers in the mid-1800s and then broadcast radio and television in the early half of the 20th century.[5] Media providers were able to cross-subsidize news production independent of private or political patronage thanks to three things: (1) high-speed printing presses or broadcast facilities, (2) geographic-based market and pricing power, and (3) the widespread advertising base that was made possible by (1) and (2). [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:22 am
Though the Court of Appeals doesn’t say so explicitly in the City of Sullivan v. [read post]
