Search for: "Superior Court v. Civil Service Commission"
Results 221 - 240
of 380
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 3:13 pm
The lessons taught by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in its recently-published decision in Protect Agricultural Land v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Justice Ewaschuk of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The court also reviewed the value of the services rendered by the wife’s counsel, Marcia E. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:43 am
The Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities agreed with the AP, and so did the courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
(Ontario Court of Appeal,TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
The 2001 Act only allowed for penalty of IR£500 or 6 months for failure to disclose passwords and as far as we are aware these penalties were never imposed.The Superior Courts in Ireland have on occasion in recent years issued Anton Pillar Orders and other civil warrants which required individuals to disclose passwords to representatives of Civil plaintiffs, under threat of being held in contempt and summarily jailed. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Superior Court, 208 Cal. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
EIRs: PUBLIC SERVICES/RECREATION IMPACTS City of Hayward v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Bond v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Superior Court (Monex), 176 Cal.App.4th 1554 (2009);andnbsp;andnbsp; ATandamp;T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
The court filing doesn’t allege any sort of malfeasance or breach that you’d ordinarily see in a civil lawsuit. [read post]
