Search for: "Supervisors v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
 A series of creepy clown sightings across the United States has caused a wave of hysteria, forcing police and schools to scramble to contain spreading jitters. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:40 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently addressed this issue in Kolakowski v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:42 am by Colin Miller
It is a question to has divided the few courts that have addressed the issue, and the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in Alalade v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am by Daniel Tokaji
It’s interesting that the United States hasn’t relied on the Elections Clause in its defense of Sections 4(b) and 5. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am by John Stephen
By John Stephen The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently provided employers a useful reminder of how important it is to promptly investigate allegations of harassment, or other types of discrimination, even when it appears that such investigation may be fruitless. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am by Steve Kalar
  (One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:35 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that the "class-of-one" theory of Equal Protection does not apply in the public employment context. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 11:28 am
  Yes, we're a bit nit-picky when the United States is concerned, and, yes, the United States has promulgated rules that are very much in favor of . . . surprise, surprise . . . the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Because returning a long-absent employee who suffered from severe stress to a less stressful shift could be a reasonable accommodation, a federal district court in Florida refused to dismiss a supervisor’s ADA and state law claims despite UPS’ argument that attendance was an essential function and she was not “qualified” due to her absence (Markwart v United Parcel Service, July 24, 2013, Chappell, S). [read post]
By Jared Klaus and Allen Carter State bar associations and other licensing boards were left like bleeding seals in shark-infested waters following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision this February in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Burns filed an action with a United States District Court contending that his being placed in restricted custody constituted retaliation in violation of his rights under the First Amendment, the Eighth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]