Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2009, 7:10 am
People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md) previously introduced the Shareholders United Act of 2019 (H.R. 936), a play on words invoking the Supreme Court's landmark opinion Citizens United, that would allow public company political donations only if a company has in place a procedure to assess the preferences of its shareholders. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
Yesterday's first.The Supreme Court of OhioOn November 4 last year, the Ohio Supreme Court heard oral argument in four cases challenging in a variety of ways the retroactive application of Ohio's latest sex offender classification, registration, and notification law, the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
The Supreme Court relied heavily on the institute's framework when it decided to uphold capital punishment. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:53 am
" Yes, that's right, one of the liberals on the US Supreme Court - the Justice President Obama is most likely to replace next, in fact - called the Obama Administration's doctrine of prosecutorial exceptionalism "perverse. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
David Stout of The New York Times also has coverage of the Court's decision to decline the case, as do NPR and The Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Following its pioneering role of recognizing personal data protection as a fundamental right in Brazil's Constitution, it's crucial that the Supreme Court endorses Justices Rosa Weber and Edson Fachin votes in favor of robust privacy and security by design. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:31 pm
Authorities asserted the power to search the cellphones of anyone arrested, regardless of what prompted their arrest, and even gained the state Supreme Court's approval in 2011. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:47 am
We eagerly await the Third Circuit's ruling in a forthcoming appeal to correct this novel, unprecedented, and ultimately dangerous ruling. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:06 pm
Anyhow, O';Reilly's statement that "some stuff is irrelevant" may go down in judicial history next to that of civilly committed sex offender Hendricks, quoted by the Supreme Court for the proposition that "treatment is bull____. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Supreme Court won't permit Ohio execution. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
The Supreme Court agrees with you! [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:29 am
Puryear's post reminds us that by the time mentally ill people commit heinous crimes, we're having the discussion too late. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Timbs v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
A Supreme Court mandate isn't required for Texas to correct this mistake. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
Last week, the California Supreme Court decided a big workplace privacy case, Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 4:58 pm
Here it is: Concord Monitor (NH) December 24, 2008 Agony in California Driving home from work tonight, I heard on the radio that opponents of same-sex marriage in California are filing a lawsuit to annul the marriages of 36,000 gay people in that state.I am not gay. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
The Court of Appeals then took up the issue it deferred in the passage quoted above, i.e., the “reasonableness of the electronics search” under the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 9:45 am
Then some of the prisoners who had been charged contested the lawfulness of the military tribunal's rules, and the tribunals were put on hold while the Supreme Court considered the prisoners' case. [read post]
