Search for: "Sweep v. Sweep"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2023, 2:00 pm
See Eisenhauer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm
One thing to keep in mind: a sweeping characteristic of all AKS safe harbors is the existence of fair market value within the subject transaction. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
I don’t mean to sound like a broken record, but why is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) playing a broken record? [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
And in Holder v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:23 am
Mason v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:13 pm
Heller and then further prescribed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:51 am
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
The Board Decision All the Board members agreed that Quickway’s decision to close the Louisville terminal was a partial business closure, and that even if that decision was based on union animus, the closure would only violate section 8(a)(3) of the Act if it was “motivated by a purpose to chill unionism in any of the remaining plants of the single employer and if the employer may reasonably have foreseen that such closing would likely have that effect” as set forth in Textile… [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
One such precedent was Hill v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm
Castleberry v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Our ongoing off-channel communications sweep to ensure that regulated entities, including broker-dealers and investment advisers, comply with their recordkeeping requirements is a good example. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
These exclusions sweep broadly, precluding coverage for a wide range of claims. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
In a new essay for a symposium on abortion rights being hosted by the Journal of American Constitutional History, I argue that Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
This targeted sweep is the first of its kind following the New Marketing Rules’ compliance deadline in November 2022. [read post]
