Search for: "Swift & Company v. Doe" Results 221 - 240 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson The case of Tinkler -v- Ferguson [2018] EWHC 3563 (QB) concerned a claim by a director of Stobart Group Limited (“Stobart”), against five other members of Stobart’s board of directors of that company. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Malaysia In the case of Actress Zahida Mohamed Rafik the Court of Appeal has ruled that repeating the words of a police report for publication does not constitute defamation. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Malaysia In the case of Actress Zahida Mohamed Rafik the Court of Appeal has ruled that repeating the words of a police report for publication does not constitute defamation. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
 The government’s response was swift and dramatic, revealing that it takes corporate fraud seriously. [read post]