Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 221 - 240 of 4,712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (3) What’s up with derivative works? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
But that's not what the the law in Ohio says.In other words, car dealers like Autos Direct not only wanted you to not be able to go into a courtroom where the public can find out what they did to you, but they also didn't want you to be able to use consumer protection laws against them at all. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
But that's not what the the law in Ohio says.In other words, car dealers like Autos Direct not only wanted you to not be able to go into a courtroom where the public can find out what they did to you, but they also didn't want you to be able to use consumer protection laws against them at all. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Ted Frank
Unfortunately, the media is uniformly describing this case as one of consumers vs. businesses, when it's really one of consumers vs. lawyers trying to protect their monopoly on dispute resolution procedures. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am by Eric Goldman
Apple More Evidence That IP Law Protects Individual Emoji Depictions–Nirvana v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
It doesn’t make any sense to me to split up the call-to-action and registration page, so I can’t defend this practice. [read post]