Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 221 - 240
of 304,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
In this respect, the [opponent] cited inter alia decisions T 932/93 and T 358/08, which confirmed that a request according to R 99(1)(c) could be implicit, the extent of the appeal being a matter for the grounds of appeal. [read post]
11 May 2023, 4:43 pm
Although there are no overlapping goods or services, the struggling toy retainer doesn’t like the similarity of the trademarks. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The appellant refers inter alia to decision T 473/08 (by a different BoA) to point out that “a non-technical problem can have a technical solution”. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:21 am
You can read more about the Mark T. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:12 am
T. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
In this respect the Board concurs with the findings of T 1149/97 [6.1.9-10] that a “cut-off” effect due to the grant of a patent can be seen in the formal restrictions imposed on further amendments to the patent specification by R 80 and R 138 and, substantively only in the restriction imposed by A 123(3). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
The decision goes on to state (point [8.3]) that a search can only be dispensed with under R 45 EPC 1973 (now R 63) if it is not possible to carry out a “meaningful” search. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
That specific surface is measured by a single point method in accordance with JIS-R-1626 […]. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
The post You Don’t Need a Huge R&D Budget to Be Innovative appeared first on IP.com - IP Innovation and Analytics. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 5:58 am
R. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 10:09 pm
R&D involved experimentation, which essentially means to try something and see what happens because you don’t already know for sure. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
For this reason, the composition of the OD violated A 19(2), first sentence.[4] Violations of A 19(2) were considered to be substantial procedural violations which led to a remittal of the case under A 111(1) and to the reimbursement of the appeal fee in several cases (see decisions T 251/88, T 939/91, T 382/92, T 476/95, T 838/02, T 1349/10).[5] The Board is aware that in two of the cases mentioned above (T 251/88 and T… [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
”A similar position is also held by other Boards of appeal, as can be seen from the cited decisions T 382/96 and T 446/00, but also decisions T 1126/97 [3.1.1 et seq.] and T 47/03 [1.1, 1.4 et seq.] as well as T 745/03 [2.2] and T 221/0 [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:30 pm
New data show that elevated Troponin T result in increased cardiovascular death and complications. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:30 am
Continue reading "You Can’t Spell “America” Without C A R"The post You Can’t Spell “America” Without C A R appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:03 pm
T 830/03 [1.1-2]. [read post]
19 May 2017, 1:12 pm
"R-E-S-P-E-C-T(ing) The Denial Of Rehearing En Banc: Paging all legal nerds . . . . [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
There are some banners up with history about John T. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
In the Matter of Felton R. v Gloria P., Felton R. no longer wanted to be held to his paternal responsibilities. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
According to R 114(1), any observations by a third party shall be filed in writing. [read post]
