Search for: "TEAGUE v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
If a new rule is procedural, then Teague rears its ugly head. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The process that the Court uses to decide whether to make one of its criminal law rulings retroactive, to closed cases, dates from its 1989 ruling in Teague v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:00 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Carl Robin Teague, Rankin's appellate lawyer, said he was troubled by the ruling because it deferred to the law over the state constitution. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:19 am
This book examines: -An Overview of Section 2255 Proceedings, including the relationship of Section 2255 to other federal postconviction remedies -Timing Considerations, including the statute of limitations -Section 2255 Jurisdiction, including custody and mootness, and cognizable claims -Obstacles to Relief, including retroactive application of Teague v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1366 Issues: (1) Whether the retroactivity analysis of Teague v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am by John Elwood
Harris12-885Issue: (1) Whether the Seventh Circuit contravened either the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) or Teague v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm by Amy Howe
Perhaps somewhat to Shapiro’s surprise, Gorsuch then asked about Teague v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  This is consistent with the Court's treatment of the questions of what is a "new rule" for the purpose of retroactivity under Teague v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Joining the state’s petitions for that Conference is Reginald’s own petition in Carr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]