Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 221 - 240
of 35,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
The recent ruling by the California Supreme Court in Estrada v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 2:16 pm
In holding this way, the California Supreme Court’s decision reversed the California Court of Appeal decision which held otherwise. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:47 pm
The California Supreme Court held its (usually) weekly conference on October 13, 2010. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm
The California Supreme Court, in the case of People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:38 am
The California Supreme Court, in the case of People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
The California Supreme Court sided with the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:26 am
Ford, currently pending before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
On June 17, 2010, the California Supreme Court denied the petition for review and request for depublication in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:16 pm
On Thursday, January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court announced in the case of Vazquez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm
The California Supreme Court held its (usually) weekly conference on March 28, 2012. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:46 am
On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court overturned a court of appeal opinion finding that insurance claims adjusters are categorically “non-exempt” employees in Harris v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
Jake Dear, Chief Supervising Attorney of the California Supreme Court, has posted California’s First Judicial Staff Attorneys: The Surprising Role That Commissioners Played, 1885–1905, in Creating the Courts of Appeal, which is forthcoming in Volume 15 of California Legal History.In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the California Supreme Court employed legal staff — then called… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
On October 20, 2010, the California Supreme Court granted plaintiff/appellant’s petition for review in Aryeh v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:20 pm
The California Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, which means the lower court's opinion no longer may be cited as precedent. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
In reaching its decision, the California Supreme Court examined both federal immigration law and California employment law. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
As previously reported in the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives Blog, last Thursday the California Supreme Court ruled that employees must be paid for time spent undergoing security checks before leaving work. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:52 pm
Just over an hour ago, the California Supreme Court issued an order stating that it will hear the challenge to the consitutionality of Proposition 8, the ballot measure banning same-sex marriage in California which was approved by voters in this month’s election. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:43 am
When the California Supreme Court accepts review, the opinion cannot be cited. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 1:56 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court ruled that Apple must pay employees for time they spend undergoing security screening of personal items after clocking out at the end of their shift — a question the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal asked the California Supreme Court to answer more than two years ago (Frlekin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 1:05 am
In rejecting the Chancery Court’s conclusion that the California judgment was not preclusive, the Supreme Court noted that the U.S. [read post]
