Search for: "THOMAS AND KING, INC." Results 221 - 240 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Frank Brown ** Dean, INSEAD, France Panellists Kris Gopalakrishnan ** Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Infosys Technologies, India Jeffrey Joerres ** Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Manpower Inc., USA Wallace King ** Chief Executive Officer, Leighton Holdings, Australia Fred van Leeuwen ** General Secretary, Education International, Belgium Lubna S. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
Jammie Thomas managed to turn a 2007 verdict of $222,000 (which was later thrown out due to a mistrial) into a 2009 verdict of $1.29 Million. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
Their goal: to persuade prosecutors not to indict Johnson & Johnson for off-label marketing at Scios Inc., a California subsidiary. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
., Clement argued on behalf of Children's Rights Inc., while he will be arguing on behalf of two criminal defendants in Pottawattamie County. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Waltham, MA; Brad Sampson, President) Bagel Kings Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(North Chelmsford, MA; Thomas Rosedale, President) America Floors Inc. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:56 pm
Judge Thomas Zilly found these activities weren’t enough for purposeful availment. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
  Dine in Brooklyn is an initiative of the Brooklyn Borough President's Office and Best of Brooklyn, Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:51 pm
After leaving the Fed, he was general counsel at American International Group, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design valid… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]