Search for: "THOMAS P. KENNEDY" Results 221 - 240 of 405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
” 355 Mont., at 440–442, 229 P. 3d, at 448–449. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am by Kurt T. Koehler
D'Andrea Assistant Solicitor General (512) 936-2868 Texas Attorney General's Office P. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor joined), was predicated on the view that the installing of a GPS device was a trespass, and so this physical intrusion needed to be grounded on a warrant to comply with the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm by Rick Hasen
In Justice Scalia’s concurrence, joined by Justices Kennedy and Thomas, he took the position that the challenged provision was unconstitutional as applied to any corporate spending. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:34 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
  Washington lawyer Seth P. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Phillips of the Washington office of Sidley Austin and Seth P. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
(Farmer, p. 3) Notable early advocates of the recall power in Wisconsin certainly agreed that the recall power should be construed broadly. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:54 am by Michael O'Hear
Can the pro-defendant votes of Kennedy, Kagan, and Sotomayor in J.D.B. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Writing for the Court in an opinion joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (who joined the holding and most of the opinion), and Alito, Chief Justice John Roberts focused on the plain meaning of IRCA’s preemption provision. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm by Josh Blackman
The Per Curiam Opinion (from the Chief, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, obviously)  in Leal Garcia v. [read post]