Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 221 - 240 of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
In determining the sentencing guidelines range, the court failed to take into account sums paid back to the Ponzi scheme's investors in the course of the fraud. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:00 pm
He was taking a high dose of the medication, which caused him to have more sexual impulses. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am by John Elwood
This one takes some explanation. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
He resides in Palo Alto, California. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
He resides in Palo Alto, California. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Simply dividing them, as the Guidelines mandate, into levels one through six based on their criminal history is very de-humanizing and takes away the Judge's ability to impose a sentence based not only on the seriousness of the offense but the character and history of the offender. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Russ Bensing
Entertainment Merchants Assn - California’s ban on sale of violent video games to minors is struck down. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Collins that illegal manufacture of methampetamine and illegal assembly or possession of chemicals needed to make methamphetamine are allied offenses… In State v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
  Especially since he'd only been admitted to the California Bar around three years before these offenses. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Rptr. 838 (California Court of Appeals 1998). [read post]