Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
In Scurry v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:31 am
” Ransdell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 8:03 am
., LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:51 am
Yet in Francis v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
Finally, any municipal or state agency re [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
But in MOC (by his litigation friend, MG)-v-Secretary of State [2022] EWCA an Upper Tribunal Judge found that capacity was unsuitable as a key element in identifying a “status” for Article 14 as too “potentially evanescent”. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
In yet another example, even though the landlord informed a state regulator that the apartment was rent-stabilized, the tenants were provided a free-market lease.To achieve class certification, Newman Ferrara attorneys deployed a unique strategy: an issue class authorized by CPLR 906. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 11:41 pm
Post-Sisvel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:15 am
See, for example, ,Matter of Severns’ Estate; ,Crump’s Estate v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 11:31 am
In CASE OF JANSONS v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, in Meredith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:00 pm
LLC v Blanchard, No. 304876/22, 2022 N.Y. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am
Opara v Olasemo (2020) UKUT 96 (LC) and Mortimer v Calcagno (2020) UKUT 122 (LC) had found that it was not necessary to have first hand evidence from all the occupants of an HMO in order to be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the main residence of all (or a sufficient number) of tenants, and that the Tribunal can draw inferences from findings of fact, this did not help the appellants in this case. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
The court relied on Wolf v D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 3:45 am
Where, as here, the defendants submitted evidentiary material in support of that branch of their cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint, the criterion becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether one is stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845). [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
In Love v. [read post]
