Search for: "Texas v. Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 221 - 240
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
The denied cases were Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Texas v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a moratorium on new bee- and bird- harming neonicotinoid pesticide products and uses. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:21 am
Environmental Protection Agency [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency – In the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Environmental Protection Agency - 03/18/15 – In the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Likewise, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published an RFI on July 31, 2014 relating to possible changes to the similar Risk Management Program (“RMP”) rules codified at 40 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Environmental Protection Agency, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency 14-46Issue: Whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s interpretation of “appropriate” in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
EPA, 14-∞, involve whether the Environmental Protection Agency must consider costs as a factor in determining “appropriate” regulations for emissions from electric utility steam generating units. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency 14-47Issue: Whether, under a statutory directive to regulate residual public health risks from electric utility steam generating units (EGUs) hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emissions only as “appropriate and necessary,” the administrator (i) may regulate EGU HAP emissions that pose no hazard to public health, and (ii) may (or must as a Chevron Step One matter) ignore costs in determining “appropriate” regulation… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm
Truth and Illusion in the Fracking DebateFrac(k)ing, Parr v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency 13-1235Issue: (1) Whether the lower court’s refusal to require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to justify the revised 2008 national ambient air quality standards as being “not lower or higher than is necessary” can stand in light of that decision’s conflict with Whitman v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Officials from the agency also participated in much-publicized briefings with the House Committee on Energy and Commerce in October and December 2011. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
Officials from the agency also participated in much-publicized briefings with the House Committee on Energy and Commerce in October and December 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:34 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlAlabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas v. [read post]
