Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Core" Results 221 - 240 of 3,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 3:38 am by Larry Ribstein
Bret Stephens wonders why he and fellow journalists ignored the fact that “[a]lmost from the beginning, there was something amiss in the case of People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It would  be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by alysondrake
Anita Hill-“My belief is that in the past 16 years we have come closer to making the resolution of these issues an honest search for the truth, which, after all, is at the core of all legal inquiry. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 8:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The Illinlois Supreme Court had already held that the Second Amendment protects a right to carry guns in most public places, and in today's People v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:20 pm by Aaron Bruhl
That would hardly be the end of the world, but it would read the statute to sweep beyond the core of the federal interest. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:01 pm
  People often want quiet, and bullhorns are the opposite of that.Plus, it's the City of Vallejo. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
 It’s clear that Mr Waterson’s expenses claims have upset many people in Eastbourne. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:45 am by Venkat
The core of the economic value, if any, is in the ongoing content and the voice. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Prop. 57 was dishonestly sold to the people as a measure for "nonviolent offenders," but it includes people with violent records whose present offense of conviction is "nonviolent. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In 2011, the Government launched its Prevent strategy, seeking to reduce the threat of domestic terrorism by inhibiting people from becoming or supporting terrorists. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]