Search for: "Thomas v. Big "
Results 221 - 240
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 9:35 pm
’” The case cite is Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:09 pm
After an employee’s individual claim under the FLSA was rendered moot when she ignored an employer’s offer of judgment under FRCP 68 that fully satisfied her claim, she no longer had a personal interest in representing the putative, unnamed claimants, so her FLSA collective action suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, ruled a divided Court in a 5-4 decision (Genesis Healthcare Corp v Symczyk, April 16, 2013, Thomas, C). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm
Scalia and Thomas are at times somewhat principled on federalism issues (e.g. here), so that might be the way to go. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
” Kyllo v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
At issue in UARG v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
What Salinas v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am
The first thing that happened was that the court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson, who has a strong antitrust background but (a) is based in San Francisco and (b) handled discovery-related matters for Judge YGR in Epic Games v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Timbs v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
Boone Pickens, Jr. and three of his children — Elizabeth Cordia, Pamela Pickens, and Thomas B. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:50 pm
It would certainly be big news if the Court were to overrule Harris. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
The big case, though, will be State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert/Pfizer Thomas Cona et. al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
Yesterday was a big day at the Court, with opinions in three cases and equally divided affirmances in two more. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 10:04 am
Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:14 am
"... in which THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined; with respect to Part IV–A, in which THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined; and with respect to Part V, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Big generalizations. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 12:35 pm
But -- I think at first -- it's nice to hear him back up Justice Thomas's credibility on an issue that he's been scoffed at for so many years.And then I think: Was it really true that Roe v. [read post]
