Search for: "Thomas v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:22 pm
Apparently a V-22 squadron operations officer, Maj. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Jason Guyser On January 28, 2013, Hon. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:10 pm
Thomas: [This is an automatic appeal from an August 1995 judgment of death. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:01 am
Prem Management, LLC, Berkshire Superior Court Civil Action No. 2013-151A, this actually occurred. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Appointed to the Superior Court 18 months ago.Interesting stuff all around. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:50 am
By Thomas Kaufman As many readers of this blog know by now, last week the Supreme Court issued yet another anti-class certification decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am
That was the Court’s holding Wednesday in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm
Snipers will prowl the roof of the New Haven Superior Court this morning just as they have on other occasions when Steven Hayes appeared there. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
” In trial before the North Carolina Superior Court, Iredell County, Hoover was convicted of the charge and sentenced to hang. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm
R & G applied to the Superior Court of Justice to set aside the arbitral award. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
Cate, No. 10-99019:By order of the district court, Albert Brown was granted leave to intervene in Morales v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:36 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Travis Anderson In Sky Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am
The court’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:25 pm
Thomas V. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:48 am
Reporting on the Supreme Court's Nov. 28th decision in In Aaron Reid v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:08 pm
Plaintiff argued its mark is instead suggestive and, therefore, inherently distinctive, and that it had acquired secondary meaning in any event.Under Local Rule 7(h), defendants need not (and may not) respond unless the court requests that it do so.The case cite is The Christensen Firm v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 11:03 am
The Hamilton Superior Court denied the motion. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Cover of Tom ScholzCiting the long-recognized fair reporting privilege, Massachusetts Superior Court Judge John C. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm
In October, 2023, the federal court remanded the case to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia. [read post]
