Search for: "Thornton v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
A: William Thornton, and he was the first Architect of the Capitol, and his design was selected as the basis for the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yet the Court upheld this exemption against such a challenge, in Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
Further, Anthony Thornton QC J has ‘certified that this judgment may be cited and referred to in other cases or situations. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
Further, Anthony Thornton QC J has ‘certified that this judgment may be cited and referred to in other cases or situations. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Employee’s argument that “mitigating circumstances” should temper imposing the penalty of dismissal from her position rejected Thornton v Edwards-Knox Cent. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by TJ McIntyre
  Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:51 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The English High Court recently considered this issue in Wah (Aka Alan Tang) & Anor v Grant Thornton International Ltd & Ors. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:50 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
State, which revised the court's precedents to allow appellate courts to change verdicts to crimes never charged by the prosecution. [read post]