Search for: "Tim Wu" Results 221 - 240 of 571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 I see a lot of Type II cases (what Tim Wu calls tolerated uses, which Balganesh suggests populate his Type II category) as at least arguable defendant victories. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:17 pm by justinsilverman
Tim Wu, author and law professor at Columbia University, posed and attempted to answer this question in a June op-ed in The New York Times. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by Bridget Crawford
Phil Weiser pweiser Colorado Adam Winkler adamwinkler UCLA Mary Wong marymagistra UNH Kevin Woodson unyoung_ Drexel Joshua Wright Josh_D_Wright George Mason Tim Wu superwuster Columbia Jane Yakowitz JaneYakowitz Arizona Sandi Zellmer SandraZellmer Nebraska Jonathan Zittrain zittrain Harvard Christopher Zorn prisonrodeo Penn State [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am by Bridget Crawford
Phil Weiser pweiser Colorado Adam Winkler adamwinkler UCLA Mary Wong marymagistra UNH Joshua Wright Josh_D_Wright George Mason Tim Wu superwuster Columbia Jane Yakowitz JaneYakowitz Arizona Jonathan Zittrain zittrain Harvard Christopher Zorn prisonrodeo Penn State [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Adam Thierer
(I have a new paper coming out shortly that will documented why Wu’s remedy would be such a disaster in practice.) [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Adam Thierer
(I have a new paper coming out shortly that will documented why Wu’s remedy would be such a disaster in practice.) [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Adam Thierer
Of course, some academic and regulatory activists like Columbia’s Tim Wu favor a very different sort of regime based on “agency threats” and a preemptive dismantling of the digital economy through the imposition of a “Separations Principle. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Adam Thierer
(I have a new paper coming out shortly that will documented why Wu’s remedy would be such a disaster in practice.) [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:24 am by Adam Thierer
I invite you to read the works of Tim Wu, Dawn Nunziato, or Frank Pasquale (among others) to see what I am talking about. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:44 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
On Friday I mentioned Tim Wu’s op-ed last week, which asked if machines “have a constitutional right to free speech”? [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Tim Wu had an interesting op-ed column in Wednesday’s New York Times: Free Speech for Computers? [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:02 pm by Laura Brookover
Tim Wu, a Columbia law professor, has called the legislation “an obvious first amendment violation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:00 am by Gyi Tsakalakis
And as Columbia law school professor, Tim Wu, told the Guardian, online course evaluations? [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:54 am by Adam Thierer
A growing cabal of cyberlaw experts—Tim Wu, Dawn Nunziato, Frank Pasquale, among many others—argue that some sort of regulation is needed. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:11 am by Jack Goldsmith
  Cyberspace is not remotely a borderless domain (Tim Wu and I wrote a book on this topic). [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:00 am by Hal Singer
In a February 2012 paper delivered to the OECD, Tim Wu explained that competition law can be used to “increase the costs of exclusion,” which if successful, would promote innovation among application providers. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Tim Wu, Laura DeNardis, Andrew Odlyzko, Deven Desai, and Brett Frischmann himself. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:03 am by Marvin Ammori
The others taking part in this symposium are a who’s who of heavy hitting thinkers in the field, from Georgetown’s Julie Cohen and Columbia’s Tim Wu to top Google lawyer Rick Whitt. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:56 pm by Frank Pasquale
The symposium will include contributions from Julie Cohen, Laura Denardis, Andrew Odlyzko, Tim Wu, Marvin Ammori, Timothy B. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Adam Thierer
And regulatory advocates like Tim Wu and the New America Foundation were running around saying that the FCC needed to pursue massive regulation of the cellular industry for a variety of silly reasons. [read post]