Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson" Results 221 - 240 of 533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 10:58 pm by Patricia Salkin
” East End Eruv Association v Town of Southampton, (Suffolk Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191, 1206 [under UCL, California employer’s failure to pay overtime wages to out-of-state employees was an unlawful business practice]; Tomlinson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
The IPKat previously reported (here) the High Court decision in Blue Gentian v Tristar Products; a decision perhaps most notable for its brevity. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Reference was made to a number of cases, in particular, Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
In the absence of actual harm, privacy cases are hardly worth pursuing http://t.co/6RYcmFS01Q -> United States: Nudity, Privacy and the Prostitute – Susan Brenner http://t.co/8r3oTanQVT -> Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson http://t.co/qHm27iucpC -> Web Site Accessibility Standards in Ontario http://t.co/5GkvGyebgZ -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-23: Computer and… [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson’s excellent post came as a welcome reassurance that the Misuse of Private Information (“MOPI”) tort should survive the proposed repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”). [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
In the absence of actual harm, privacy cases are hardly worth pursuing http://t.co/6RYcmFS01Q -> United States: Nudity, Privacy and the Prostitute – Susan Brenner http://t.co/8r3oTanQVT -> Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson http://t.co/qHm27iucpC -> Web Site Accessibility Standards in Ontario http://t.co/5GkvGyebgZ -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-23: Computer and… [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Quantum in Privacy Cases The judge considered thirteen “comparables” – from Cornelius v Taranto ([2001] EMLR 329) to Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2014] EMLR 24) ([171] to [183]). [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of the Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:17 am by INFORRM
 There was only one such injunction in 2014 (AMM v News Group [2014] EWHC 4063 (QB), see our post here) and one in 2013 (Rocknroll v News Group Newspapers ([2014] EWHC 24 (Ch)). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
– Mark Thomson Case Law: Cooper v Turrell – the assessment of damages for libel and misuse of private information – Hugh Tomlinson QC Hemming and Haigh: Freedom of Speech and Abuse of Privilege Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” – Max Mosley “Harassment and the Media”: Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann Case Law: “Clift v Slough Borough Council – Qualified Privilege meets Article 8″ – Lorna… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
 This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:36 am by INFORRM
There seems to be little chance of IPSO finding such a breach, following its rulings in Littler v Sunday Express, and Elton-Campbell v Daily Mail. [read post]