Search for: "U S Dept of Justice"
Results 221 - 240
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Zak, 2009 NY Slip Op 31308(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County June 10, 2009), decided by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Slawski, CPA, P.C., 2011 NY Slip Op 30476(U) (Sup Ct NY County Feb. 28, 2011), decided earlier this year by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Judith J. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Nelson, 54 AD3d 258 (1st Dept 2008), in which the court enforced the LLC's default statute in upholding a majority vote of the members to remove one of the managers. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
Aronson, Mayesfsky & Sloan, LLP, 168 AD3d 70, 75-76 [1st Dept 2018]; Harvey v Greenberg, 82 AD3d 683, 683 [1st Dept 2011]; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Chief Justice John Roberts Defends Supreme Court’s ‘Highest Standards of Conduct,’ Offers No New Rules ABC News – Devin Dwyer | Published: 5/24/2023 Chief Justice John Roberts defended the integrity of the Supreme Court in the face of slumping public approval and growing political pressure after a recent barrage of misconduct allegations. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 10:45 am
Dept. of Justice, Nat. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:00 am
The answers are provided in a recent decision by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Timothy S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Sake, Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 50999(U) (Sup Ct Kings County June 3, 2011). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 4:19 am
Slip Op. 50223(U) (1st Dept. 2003) (At the pleading stage it was sufficient to merely allege that children were left home alone where they were five years and seven months old respectively, the mother lied about the children’s supervision and the seven month old fell out of bed); People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:46 am
Co., 222 AD2d 357 [1st Dept 1995]. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm
Justice Scarpulla’s ruling in Rosania did not address the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s claim for dissolution. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:06 am
Invalid Stock Sale Rescues Shareholder’s Derivative Claims Jiang v Wu, 2019 NY Slip Op 00576 [2d Dept Jan. 29, 2020], involves a 25% shareholder’s derivative action against the controlling shareholders of a real estate holding corporation. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:55 am
In a sixth decision, the court reassigned the proceeding to Justice Franco, the same justice who dismissed Sapirstein’s dissolution counterclaim in Corner Furniture. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
Seven Suffolk County justices. including Justice Luft, were randomly assigned to preside over plaintiffs action and recused themselves before the matter was assigned to the undersigned. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
Merritt, 2008 NY Slip Op 30087(U). [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Ran, 2012 NY Slip Op 31620(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County June 12, 2012), where the court dismissed derivative claims for not alleging with adequate particularity the futility of a demand on the subject corporation's board of directors. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Ran, 2012 NY Slip Op 31620(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County June 12, 2012), where the court dismissed derivative claims for not alleging with adequate particularity the futility of a demand on the subject corporation's board of directors. [read post]
