Search for: "U. S. District Court" Results 221 - 240 of 5,088
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
District Court of Appeals threw out the dress code, ruling that North Carolina charter schools are "state actors" working on the government's behalf, so they can't impose rules that won't fly in traditional public schools. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
District Court of Appeals threw out the dress code, ruling that North Carolina charter schools are "state actors" working on the government's behalf, so they can't impose rules that won't fly in traditional public schools. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm by Ilya Somin
District Court for the Western District of Missouri convicted petitioner Marcus DeAngelo Jones of two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The District Court granted summary judgment for AWF on its assertion of “fair use”, but the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
Factual Background (The facts are taken primarily from the Supreme Courts opinion, with selected facts added from the District Courts opinion.) [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:15 am by John Powers
., inventors) to send cease and desist letters, file complaints in federal district court, and at times endure patent litigation to its completion. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:15 am by John Powers
., inventors) to send cease and desist letters, file complaints in federal district court, and at times endure patent litigation to its completion. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am by Matt Tait
He will be tried by a jury in South Florida—a district that, if anything, is strongly biased in his favor. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the District of New Mexico also weighed in on standing in the data-breach context in McCombs. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:44 am by David Adelstein
The federal district court explained: The direct beneficiary of that [sub-subcontractor’s] work was the owner of the property that was improved by the work, not [the prime contractor]. [read post]