Search for: "U. S. v. Barrett*#" Results 221 - 240 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
[Like in the Emoluments Clauses cases, plaintiff’s mere allegation that the government is acting ultra vires is not enough to establish an equitable cause of action ] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman, Lecturer, Maynooth University Department of Law. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett voted to vacate the Fifth Circuit's decision "staying the district court's preliminary injunction. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Under Conte’s omniforeseeability analysis, why not? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” If an operating agreement contains the word “shall” in the context of advancement or indemnification, the right generally should be considered “mandatory” (Comer v Krolick, 2015 NY Slip Op 32274(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 2, 2015]). [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Ilya Somin
Today's Supreme Court decision in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]