Search for: "U. S. v. Bias" Results 221 - 240 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 9:52 am by Eric
My iconic TV ad has a first name, it's "C-U-T-E," my iconic TV ad has a second name, it's "K-I-D. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm by axd10
Wal-Mart and the Efficacy of Monolithic Class Actions. 83 U. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:05 am
A party seeking to vacate an arbitration award must prove one or more of the limited reasons for vacating the award set out in Article 75Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 51989(U), Decided on November 8, 2010, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Barbara Jaffe, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]Theodore Smith, a tenured physical education teacher at the New York City Department of Education’s Museum School, was… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Subjective bias: Patent Office and courts felt need to protect public from incredible inventions. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
IntroductionToday's Legal theory Lexicon is about the "reasonable person. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm by Bexis
”  Due to the “the inherent bias in the” AERs, they “cannot be relied upon to form causation opinions. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Carter Ruml
  In the asset protection game, the debtor is usually the underdog, and that’s one reason KYEstates cheerfully discloses a bias in favor of debtors. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Carter Ruml
In the asset protection game, the debtor is usually the underdog, and that’s one reason KYEstates cheerfully discloses a bias in favor of debtors.  [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Bielby "concluded that Wal-Mart is 'vulnerable' to bias or gender stereotyping but failed to identify a specific discriminatory policy at Wal-Mart. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
I’m delighted to respond to Nell Minow’s thoughtful and interesting testimony on the Citizens United case. [read post]