Search for: "U. S. v. Borders"
Results 221 - 240
of 416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
Analysis The Obama Administration's decision, announced Tuesday through various public documents and a background briefing, to transfer some of the Guantanamo Bay prisoners to the U.S. mainland for long-term detention without a trial may have a major impact on the Supreme Court's pending review of Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
Alabama, 15-6290 Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
But that's not exactly what the proposed bill would do.To be sure, language in Bigelow v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
To keep them from reentering he’s going to build a “huge” wall along our southern border—a plan that he clearly has not carefully considered. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
U. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:00 am
A few hours after the OPPO v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
But we know that’s simply not true. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
California, 460 U. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
California, 460 U. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
California, 460 U. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm
The case became final on April 24, 2019, when the Norwegian Supreme Court refused to grant leave to hear its appeal (HR-2019-766-U, on file with author). [read post]
30 May 2018, 6:12 am
City Disposal Systems, Inc., 465 U. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 4:09 pm
Fi-lardo, 336 U. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:39 am
Sa famille n’a reçu aucune information officielle mais estime selon des sources non-officielles qu’il aurait été emmené au tribunal militaire spécial au sein de la base de la police militaire à Qaboun. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Senate passed “The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act” (S. 744). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
Court's previous holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
