Search for: "U. S. v. Driver" Results 221 - 240 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Reichley of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas sustained a defendant's preliminary objections and struck a plaintiff's claims for recklessness and punitive damages based upon a plaintiff's allegations that the defendant driver was using a cell phone at the time of the accident. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Reichley of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas sustained a defendant's preliminary objections and struck a plaintiff's claims for recklessness and punitive damages based upon a plaintiff's allegations that the defendant driver was using a cell phone at the time of the accident. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:01 am
Taking away some of the cost to Hamilton Meats reduces the company's incentive to put only the safest drivers on the road. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:25 am
Town of Brookhaven, respondents Subscription Required APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTReal Property Town Properly Exercised Eminent Domain Power To Condemn Farmland to Preserve Rural Character NEW YORK COUNTYTorts U-Haul Owed No Duty to Lawyer's Client For Auctioning Off Client's Art Stored by Lawyer Long v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
The Court of Appeals accordingly reversed the district court's denial of Defendant's motion to suppress. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
  Here is how bad such a presumption is in Maryland: "[U]nder Maryland law, 'knowledge of the contents of the vehicle can be imputed to the driver of the vehicle.' State v. [read post]