Search for: "U. S. v. Holder" Results 221 - 240 of 561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 12:39 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
 Lubin Austermuehle  track record includes the fact that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Blogger’s Note:  Many thanks to my talented co-author, Tieranny Cutler] Beware the Employer Risks Nesting in President Biden’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill By Angelo A. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Blogger’s Note:  Many thanks to my talented co-author, Tieranny Cutler] Beware the Employer Risks Nesting in President Biden’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill By Angelo A. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:57 pm
Further, the existence of an investigation report u/s 209A or the pendency of an investigation u/s 235 was not sufficient grounds for refusing to sanction a scheme which was approved by the general body. [read post]