Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
In this case the Federal Circuit carefully applied the fact/law principles we set forth in U. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
S. 456, 464 (1996) (decisions about enforcement of “the Nation’s criminal laws” lie within the “special province of the Executive” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Buckley v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
s reliance on our decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:12 am
TBL Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
S. 419, 434 (1995) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:38 am
S. 419, 434 (1995) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:30 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari to yet another consumer arbitration case, CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:18 pm
Reversing a decision of the Regional Court of Düsseldorf, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf (20 U 48/09) held that this use did not amount to genuine use of the trade mark (Article 15(1) CTMR). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:17 am
Carl v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Facebook and Prager U. v YouTube. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:34 am
U. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Inverted U phenomenon we’re arguing for is limited to those super-strong marks. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
Maciel and Mark M. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:34 am
Nussbaum. 36 AD3d 176, 825 NYS2d 55 [2d Dept 2006] [internal citations and quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
The OU kosher mark consists of a U within a circle. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:23 am
S. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
Curtin v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:12 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
