Search for: "U. S. v. Money" Results 221 - 240 of 1,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 12:39 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
 Lubin Austermuehle  track record includes the fact that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
Simon v Moskowitz In Simon v Moskowitz, the Appellate Division affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court’s order dismissing claims by a minority member against the majority member of a profitable, two-member LLC that owns a 60-unit, rental apartment building in the Bronx. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am by Kevin Kaufman
We review the evidence for the R&D tax credit’s effectiveness and the credit’s complexity, while recommending ways to improve the credit if it is retained in the tax code. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Reed, Morse v LoveLive TV US, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51481(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Dec. 15, 2020], considered Darcy‘s concept of “informal dissolution” and its implications for individual controller liability. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But the risk of civil liability doesn't much affect speakers who have no money. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
Money spent on a motion to dismiss will almost always be better spent elsewhere. [read post]