Search for: "U.S. v. Buchanan*"
Results 221 - 240
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 1:21 pm
Under Miller v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 7:53 am
., et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Monroe County, Ala., 520 U.S. 781, 785 n.2 (1997); Kentucky v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
To borrow from Reyes v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 4:45 pm
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:18 pm
Two laws in the U.S. territories challenge... [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
Council, 529 U.S. at 10-15, 120 S.Ct. 1084; Heckler v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:42 pm
U.S. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:32 am
Actually, it was a motion to dismiss or join the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's 2005 Granholm v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:04 pm
Henderson, 2007 U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
Programs and Initiatives: Networking, mentoring, retreats, and seminars on navigating law firm life as a working mother all help to create a more comfortable environment for women balancing their work and home lives. [34] For example, Nixon Peabody has instituted a formal mentoring program that requires that all young lawyers, regardless of gender, have one senior colleague to turn to. [35] Epstein Becker& Green, P.C. enjoys a 50% female attorney ratio, and 25% of its partners are women -… [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 pm
Per U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:44 am
U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
A lawyer for the company questioned whether U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), provided the opportunity for a wholesale re-examination of the federal sentencing scheme that had held judges, defendants and practitioners alike in thrall for some 17 years. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Galveston City Company, 111 U.S. 170 (1884), the United States Supreme Court observed that the limitations defense of an agent would also protect those on whose behalf the agent acted as agent. 111 U.S. at 174 ("But manifestly the statute of limitations that barred the claims against Menard . . . would equally protect those on whose behalf Menard acted as agent"). [read post]
