Search for: "U.S. v. Diaz"
Results 221 - 240
of 569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 3:08 pm
Opinion by Diaz, Circuit Judge.Holding: The Maryland Credit Grantor Closed End Provisions (CLEC) are not violated when a creditor discovers and cures an interest rate on debt that is being charged in excess of the legal limit within sixty days of discovery. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
The Court of Appeals held that the lower courts had “properly applied the holding of” Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:11 am
Circuit in Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:20 pm
S. 229, and n. 7 (1974); Diaz v. [read post]
Supervisor's Expert Testimony Did Not Violate Confrontation Clause By Describing Peer Review Process
19 Jan 2010, 12:38 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. __, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:42 am
Diaz, 2008 U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:30 am
Diaz, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:23 pm
(Tell that to the A.G. now dealing with exhaustion in Fresno . . . .)Diaz-Sanchez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Rees, 551 U.S. ---- (U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
California, 505 U.S. 437, 439 (1992); see State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:05 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 1:16 pm
Diaz-Delgado, 2008 U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 10:56 am
Supreme Court's decisions Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
Defendant wins the appeal.Defendant wins because settled Supreme Court authority, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Diaz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:54 pm
Diaz-Castaneda, 2007 U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
In recent years, the application of the right to confrontation in the context of laboratory or DNA test evidence has been the subject of much litigation at the United States Supreme Court In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [2009]), the Supreme Court held that it violate the right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of a person who performed the test subject to confrontation. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
