Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Marigold et al v Wells (2023) UKUT 33 (LC) – Upper Tribunal on a reasonable excuse defence to a rent repayment order. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa (“Aérospatiale”), the Supreme Court addressed blocking statutes, holding that they “do not deprive an American court of the power to order a party subject to its jurisdiction to produce evidence even though the act of production may violate that statute,” and laid out a balancing test for courts to use in determining whether to order cross-border discovery.[3] (The… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Al Qaida, et al. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am
" Google opposes any trial date earlier than November 6 because of a potential conflict with the trial in the first United States et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:58 am
Don’t Waste Michigan, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
Data Protection Commissioner (commonly known as “Schrems I”), the court invalidated the Safe Harbor self-certification framework that U.S. companies had been using to conduct data transfers from the EU to the United States.[8] Almost immediately after the court issued the Schrems decision, the European Commission and the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:10 pm
PERLMUTTER et al, Docket No. 1:22-cv-01564, Paper No. 16 (D.D.C. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:23 pm
Its in-house adjudicative proceeding does not prevent the merger from closing.This is the order on the motion to stay and the next deadlines and hearing dates:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:16 am
In Arizona et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
First, the document:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:54 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
Judge Corley has just granted the latter:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm
Anne Arundel County 2022). [2] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
Microsoft just made its responsive filing, and it's a motion to stay the case:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
Hull & Chandler, P.A. et al – United States District Court – Western District of North Carolina – January 4, 2023) involves a claim of a stolen deposit placed in a bank. [read post]
