Search for: "UNITED V. PEREZ"
Results 221 - 240
of 744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Argument preview: Justices turn to constitutional limits on appointment of administrative law judges
16 Apr 2018, 7:02 am
Perez on Tuesday and Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas that are consolidated for an hour of argument. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
(Administrative Procedures Act (APA); National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); Tribal Consultation) Perez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
(“Under the seminal United States Supreme Court decision in United States v Perez (22 US 579 [1824]), where a court declares a mistrial without the consent or over the objections of a defendant, the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy will preclude a retrial for the same offenses unless ‘there is a manifest necessity for [the mistrial], or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 10:31 am
Perez, 681 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
Oklahoma; Due Diligence) Perez and Torres v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:06 am
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, Esq. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:02 pm
App’x at 642 (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
De Alba Pagan, 33 F.3d 125, 129 (1st Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. [read post]