Search for: "US Fidelis, Inc"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,019
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2020, 7:22 am
§ 1051(a)(3)(C)) or “a bona fide intention… to use a trademark in commerce” (15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:51 am
§28-2-110 is Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. [read post]
Precedential No. 12: Finding Clothing and Books Related, TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition to ENGIRLNEER
16 Mar 2020, 4:09 am
Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Liberty Lobby, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Sys., Inc., 92 AD3d 29, 35 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
To prove such an intention, a party must show that "its activities are those that a reasonable businessman with a bona fide intent to use the mark in United States would have undertaken. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:08 am
Hole In 1 Drinks, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:08 pm
CPS Security Solutions, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:24 am
According to DOJ’s press release: Patient Services Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:33 pm
For example, the Final Rule specifies that whether the employee is economically dependent on the potential joint employer, including factors traditionally used to establish whether a particular worker is a bona fide independent contractor (e.g., the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss, their investment in equipment and materials, etc.), are not relevant to determine joint employer liabili [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 1:44 am
Although the loan was funded by the parties' illegal gambling operation (for which both were criminally prosecuted), the record does not support a characterization of their conduct as "malum in se, or evil in itself" (Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc., 80 NY2d 124, 128 [1992]) and the source of funds used for a loan is not typically a factor in determining its validity. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:53 am
Corp., 51 Cal. 3d 701, 707 (1990) (“[The transaction] is exempt from the usury laws because it was a bona fide credit sale. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Multicon Builders, Inc., 57 Ohio St.3d 107 (1991) (“[A] bona fide purchaser for value is bound by any encumbrance upon land only if he has c [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:02 am
January 28, 2020 - 2 PM: Progressive Beverages, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 8:11 am
Based on an aggregate review of the abridged listing through the lens of 2019, the following findings, drivers, data points, and tracking charts may be useful for understanding M&A+I activity patterns in the eDiscovery ecosystem from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:52 am
Based on an aggregate review of the abridged listing through the lens of Q4 2019, the following findings, data points, and tracking charts may be useful for understanding M&A+I activity patterns in the eDiscovery ecosystem from October 1, 2019, through December 26, 2019. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
Walmart Stores Inc., and was filed in federal court in the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
On December 11, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
