Search for: "US v. Boss"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
The decision in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Case C‑311/18 (aka Schrems II), has brought into question whether any transfers to the US can be valid, and has opened up the Binding Corporate Rules regime, which is used by some of the world’s biggest multinational groups, to challenge. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
This Kat has sufficiency (of mice) objectionsWelcome to the latest IPKat roundup, which should especially cheer fans of patent news and views.PatentsKodak's most recent endeavours, by way of an announced pivot to generic pharmaceutical manufacturing thanks to a US government COVID-response loan, swiftly followed by an insider trading investigation which put the loan on hold, drew comment from PermaKat Neil Wilkof.In news from Australia, GuestKat Rose Hughes reported on the confirmation… [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm
Kat Friend Xi Lin provided her comments on Jin Yong v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 11:00 am
Let's start with Bostock v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
” Can you unravel that a bit for us? [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
As the General Court had established in T-111/16, Prada v EUIPO, a well-known trade mark (as 'PRADA' and 'BOSS' are) enjoys extended protection, but no protection is available when the latter’s sign fails to establish a link with it (as it was for 'THE RICH PRADA' and hotel services in that case, and 'BOSS SHOT' and the goods mentioned above here). [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
But Biskupic tells us that the pain "remain[s] fresh"–for Kavanaugh, that is, not Christine Blasey Ford. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In 2001, the US Supreme Court handed down Atwater v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:32 am
Trademark Office issued the following 159 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2020 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Overhauser Law Offices the publisher of this site, assists with US and foreign trademark searches, trademark applications and assists with enforcing trademarks via infringement litigation and licensing. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm
Roberts made similar moves in Seila Law, but his target was the old boss: Chief Justice Rehnquist. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
As a result, many workers decline to assert their rights for fear that bosses will fire them for doing so. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
Using Data and Respecting Users,, Communications of the ACM, 2020, Marshall W. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 8:25 pm
Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:04 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
These mobile lawyers moved across colonial/postcolonial jurisdictions in the course of their practice, and using their lives as an archive helped think across fields that are usually historiographicaly distinct. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Then, in a case of first impression, McKithen v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 1:08 pm
Code Section 44-146.17; and (2) Article V of the Constitution of Virginia. [read post]
31 May 2020, 1:08 pm
Code Section 44-146.17; and (2) Article V of the Constitution of Virginia. [read post]
