Search for: "US v. Cook" Results 221 - 240 of 3,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm
The patents at issue are owned by Cook and are patent nos. 5,035,706, PERCUTANEOUS STENT AND METHOD FOR RETRIEVAL THEREOF and 5,755,777, EXPANDABLE TRANSLUMINAL GRAFT PROSTHESIS FOR REPAIR OF ANEURYSM, which have been issued by the US Patent Office. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am by Dave
We have dealt with the basic facts in Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd [2014] UKSC 52 when considering its previous incarnations (Cooke v Mortgage Business [2012] EWCA Civ 17 and Re North East Property Buyers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2991 (Ch)). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 4:30 pm by National Indian Law Library
Cook Inlet Region, Inc (federal question jurisdiction, Alaska Native Claims and Settlement Act claims). * U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:58 pm
On Friday, I wrote about how lawyers working for Polaris IP (Erich Spangenberg) want to use the discovery process in Polaris IP v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:45 pm
On April 23, 2008, Judges Daughtrey, Cook and Farris of the 6th U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:50 am by Cheryl Beise
Substantial evidence supported the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s determination following inter partes review that a patent owned by Frymaster LLC for measuring cooking oil degradation in a deep fryer using a total polar materials (TPMs) sensor was not unpatentable as obvious, the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:46 am
" Judge Quist, who seemed the most friendly to the government then asked whether he was relying on Marbury v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:40 am by Robert Kreisman
Plowman Cook County Jury Verdict for $950,000 in Fraud and Breach of Contract Case; DaVinci Graphics v. [read post]