Search for: "US v. Foley" Results 221 - 240 of 558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
Ideally, it might have been better to denominate it a motion to resettle the order, which is the appropriate vehicle to clarify a prior decision (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 566). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 10, 2010 Foley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am by Terry Hart
As DC has done with the Batmobile and other Batman characters, it is common practice to license characters for use in new works.17See, e.g., Burroughs v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
” John noted an Economist article on the use of lawfare against the British Ministry of Defence. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Medium, Ned Foley looks at this term’s partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Second, my thanks to Jack Balkin and to the participants in this symposium:  Jack Rakove, Sandy Levinson, Franita Tolson, Ned Foley, and Jesse Wegman. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
To download a copy of the District Court's decision, please use this link: Conradt v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]