Search for: "US v. London" Results 221 - 240 of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 8:52 am by Pace Law Library
City of New London [videorecording] : 545 U.S. 469 (2005) / produced by Thomas Metzloff, Sarah Wood, Todd ShoemakerLucas v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm by Howard Knopf
  It’s interesting to contrast the UK Red Bus decision with the recent  controversial US 2nd Circuit decision in Cariou v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
Although Nike establishedthat LNDR could be understood to mean "Londoner" in the right context, it did "not begin to establish... that LNDR would have been perceived by the average consumer as meaning Londoner when used in respect of clothing ... in the absence of some context suggesting that meaning. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by David Canton
” The North Face’s legal counsel sent Winkelmann a cease and desist letter in August 2009, requesting that he stop using the South Butt name and logo and halt all sales, production and promotion of South Butt products. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
A quick note on a useful case on costs where an appeal has been settled. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
A quick note on a useful case on costs where an appeal has been settled. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Non-Negs may typically only be used to place bets at the gaming tables for their face value and cannot be used to buy goods or services, nor encashed. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by Steve Bainbridge
“Martin Graham, director of the London Stock Exchange’s (LSE’s) market services, said that Sarbanes-Oxley has ‘undoubtedly assisted our efforts’ and emphasized the LSE’s ability to draw new listings from foreign companies. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 pm by Peter Klose
The recent ruling falls in line with the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Jordan Gold
Reasonable expectations of privacy in voyeurism cases under the Canadian Criminal Code: London’s case of R. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
The article used information from leaked Police and SOCA (together, the Claimants) documents to allege that a man named David Hunt was the head of a renowned organized crime group and was aiming to profit from compulsory purchase of land in London. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Maurizio Borghi
by Maurizio Borghi Patents Court London, 12 January 2012, Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & Nicholas John Houghton. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:12 pm by Jarod Bona
The US Supreme Court just issued its decision in an antitrust case called Ellen Gelboim v. [read post]