Search for: "US v. Michael Speed"
Results 221 - 240
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2014, 3:18 am
For example:Settlement negotiations v. arbitration: How do decision making processes differ? [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:14 am
Those odd cross-currents marked the argument in the case of Plumhoff v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
The Sixth Circuit used the Justices’ ruling in Scott v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:56 pm
That evening, Ranger Michael Boxx discovered that one of the hikers cited, 79-year-old Robert Jacobs, had given a false name. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
Finally, there's yet another excellent analysis from Stefano Barazza on PatLit, this time in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling in AstraZeneca v Hanmi (the 'Nexium' case). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
Judge Leon sides with the government here, and uses the 1983 Supreme Court case Block v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Quincy Jones sues Michael Jackson's estate over royalties http://t.co/CZJIJQgolm -> Canada-EU trade agreement presages IP reform http://t.co/bAOcdznhju -> Viacom v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Concern expanded to software applications used to infringe copyright. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
It's good to know that the judges take notice of us, since we spend so much time taking of notice of them. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:33 pm
Stop and Frisk in Texas: Terry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:01 pm
Apple v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court in Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:38 pm
Plus, Deputy SG Michael Dreeben argued Wurie before the original panel. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
See Reno v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
Rather, my interest in King is in its implications for policies for the use of DNA in the criminal justice system. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:55 pm
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:31 am
The Two Sides of the Minimum Wage Debate: Friedman v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
and Sir Michael Briggs (he of the Case of the Pixelated Privates and, more recently, involved in the Fage v Chobani Greek yoghurt litigation, here and here, and on which a further post is expected soon) and Dame Elizabeth Gloster (Pearson Education v Prentice Hall of India, here). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
