Search for: "US v. Sales" Results 221 - 240 of 22,375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2014, 8:36 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  The main question marks here are that this section has not been used much and it was used in distinct contexts from this one. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:50 pm by Valerie Sasaki
Therefore, the money collected under both the sales and use tax components of the new law does not have to be used for the State Highway Fund (or other uses that the Constitutional provision specifically lists). [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:10 am by centerforartlaw
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email The post Case Review: US v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:04 pm by Patent Docs
Supreme Court handed down its decision today in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Almeida v Arruda, 89 Mass App Ct 241, 241-48 (MA App. 3/18/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 11:31 am
  The issue, boiled down to basics, is whether the sales rep got too involved in the actual treatment of the patient or use of equipment during surgery. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
  Old Language: “described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country” New Language: “described in a printed publication or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public”   In the case of Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:33 am by Ben Sheffner
The Ninth Circuit has posted to its web site an audio recording of Monday's oral arguments in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:39 am
You probably have been hearing a lot of news about so called “Amazon” laws being enacted to increase sales/use tax collection for Internet sales. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:47 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
The Smoke Shop was, after all, engaged in the sale of tobacco products at the time it was destroyed. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:23 pm
The statute identifies four non-exhaustive  factors to be considered in a fair use inquiry: (1) the purpose and character of the use; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the substantiality of the portion used; and (4) the effect on the potential market or value of the copyrighted work and its derivatives (citing Harper & Row v Nation Enterprises).In line with the common judicial approach, the court placed most importance on the first factor. [read post]